#BRONICA SQ A 50MM MANUAL#

I plan to do that for medium format film as well but for now I use a Canoscan 9000F scanner and vuescan software. That way you get a raw file with the usual tone and color response, easy to edit. I usually use my dslr and 100mm macro for scanning 35mm film. This was the first batch of Ektar I tried and I agree it's more difficult to edit than portra, but dont rule it out just yet! This may be of help to you. Wow, I didn't know that! It might come in handy! In this thread someone had what sounds like an involved (cock this, push that, turn this.) solution for getting the aperture to stay closed without using the dof lever. If there is any other way of getting the aperture to close I have not found it. I'm not sure if I am missing something, but I think not. Used on the Bronica cameras the Zenzanon lenses work very nicely, but with an adapter I have not been able to find any way of utilising the aperture diaphragm other than via the DOF button. I buy lots of lenses and sometimes I even use them.

#BRONICA SQ A 50MM MANUAL#

Do all of these zenzanons have manual aperture rings? I think I wrongly assumed they didn't have them, because there was a Sony Alpha adapter with what looked like electronics in it and I couldn't find an adapter for Nex.

I've been tempted to dip my toe in the Bronica pool since seeing Oldhand's threads. KolarmoraГҐn shot is my favorite, the reflections are captured so well. +1 - beautiful landscapes and very nice film processing. Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8 Instead of choosing quick and dirty presets.ДЄnd I'm certain these negatives have much more to give, with a D800 or A7r as a scanner! Still, this makes it way easier to set the correct white balance and other adjustments. It is an inferior solution but to get the most out of the scanner I set the contrast to flat and make a 16 bit dng-tiff file with no film or color presets.ДЄfter that it's pretty much standard editing, but each image needs its own unique editing done to it and it's quite time consuming. But your shots really showcase what this film can do, I should try it again.Д«lotafton wrote: This was the first batch of Ektar I tried and I agree it's more difficult to edit than portra, but dont rule it out just yet! This may be of help to you. I shot a roll of Ektar not long ago, but I had difficulties with scanning. That 2.8/50 looks good as well, but I expect nothing less from Bronica! Not too expensive on the bay either (just checked).ДЇirst two are Ektar 100 and the rest is Portra 400. I appreciate your input, thanks! It's big but manageable and the bokeh is nice for a wide angle Great landscapes, thanks for sharing! What film did you use? Mark wrote: Great landscapes, thanks for sharing! What film did you use? I really like the pine bokeh in your shot BTW. I have the 2.8/50 MC, and like yours it is capable of excellent detail. The lens is quite a handfull for a 50mm isn't it. Oldhand wrote: Very beautiful landscapes. Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it!Д«lotafton wrote: Thanks! It was an exceptionally nice day when the snow picture was taken. Iangreenhalgh1 wrote: Excellent shots, I particularly like the last one.

Bronica sq-a 50mm